Xabi Alonso’s methods questioned as Real Madrid stars split over his softer approach – report

A new report from AS has revealed a surprising detail behind Real Madrid’s victory at San Mames and the growing tension that surrounds the team’s internal dynamics.

According to the report, Xabi Alonso promised his players a two-day vacation if they defeated Athletic Bilbao, a motivational tactic that immediately energised the squad.

The players responded with one of their most convincing performances of the season, securing the win and embracing the manager’s reward.

However, the gesture did not go down well with everyone inside the club.

Granting two days off meant Madrid had only one training session to prepare for the next league match against Celta Vigo, a game they ultimately lost 0–2 in one of their most disappointing showings of the campaign.

For some at Valdebebas, the timing of Alonso’s incentive felt counterproductive, especially given the team’s recent inconsistency.

The report also highlights that Alonso has quietly modified several principles he brought with him at the start of his tenure.

Xabi Alonso’s methods are being questioned. (Photo by Angel Martinez/Getty Images)

The intention is to develop a more fluid working relationship with the squad and build trust within the dressing room.

These changes were meant to make day-to-day dynamics smoother, communication more open, and expectations more balanced.

But the outcome has not been what he hoped for. While some players have embraced the shift, others have continued to show irregular commitment and the uneven response is beginning to frustrate everyone.

Madrid’s decline in recent weeks has now triggered calls for immediate solutions . There is growing concern that the team’s attitude reflected a worrying level of complacency.

Several players have privately acknowledged that the reaction to Alonso’s trust, including the Bilbao reward, has not been good enough.

The sense inside the dressing room is that responsibility must be taken. The squad understands that the coach has shown confidence, adapted his methods, and offered flexibility, yet the group’s performances have not consistently honoured that effort.